http://onlineathens.com/stories/022709/o pi_398924605.shtml
It's at least conceivable a vast majority of the 13-member state Senate Regulated Industries and Utilities Committee - all but two, to be exact - had legitimate reasons for missing a Wednesday meeting at which they'd been scheduled to vote on sending a Sunday alcohol sales bill to the Senate floor.
It's also conceivable, however, that the committee of nine Republicans and four Democrats simply is stalling a bill that could become politically problematic for them and their General Assembly colleagues in the upcoming 2010 elections.
It wouldn't be the first time the bill has been bottled up, so to speak. It has failed to get action in the previous two General Assembly sessions.
Senate Bill 16, sponsored by Sen. Seth Harp, R-Midland, isn't a particularly complex piece of legislation. It proposes to allow residents of cities and counties across the state the opportunity to decide whether they want to be able to buy alcohol in retail stores after noon on Sundays, if their local government is willing to call for a referendum on those sales.
During recent legislative sessions, the bill has found legislators waffling among teetotaling conservatives who don't want alcohol available in stores on the Christian holy day, retailers who say they are losing out on potential sales, and the large number of Georgians who simply want a voice in the matter. This year, discussion of the bill is attenuated by the ongoing economic downturn, which has - or should have - legislators scrambling to find any new streams of tax revenue such as Sunday alcohol sales might bring.
Here, briefly, are how the numbers in favor of Sunday store sales of alcohol break down:
Earlier this month, an official with Publix, one of Georgia's largest supermarket chains, told The Associated Press the sale of beer and wine at grocery stores on Sundays would result in $1.4 million in extra excise taxes and at least $3.3 million in new sales tax revenue.
A widely referenced InsiderAdvantage poll undertaken when the issue first surfaced in the General Assembly found 58 percent of Georgians wanted an opportunity to cast a ballot on the issue, a number that rose to 66 percent when respondents were told that only two other states - Connecticut and Indiana - don't allow Sunday store sales of alcohol.
On the other side of the issue, opponents of Sunday store sales relied last year on a widely debunked study done in New Mexico - where voters approved Sunday alcohol sales in 1995 - that purported to show a subsequent increase in alcohol-related traffic accidents and fatalities. This year, opponents opted for an even less convincing approach, bringing a few dozen teenagers into a recent Senate hearing on the bill to make the dubious argument that allowing Sunday store sales would somehow make it easier for young people to illegally buy alcohol, by extending the time it would be available to them.
In addition, and certainly of the utmost concern to state legislators, is the fact that the Christian Coalition of Georgia, according to a Wednesday report in The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, has "said it would include the issue in its political scorecard that goes out to voters."
At the end of the day, the choice facing Georgia lawmakers is clear - as it has been for a couple of years now. They face a choice of giving a clear majority of Georgians what they want at the risk of offending an at least somewhat powerful conservative Christian voting bloc.
Either way, it's time for lawmakers to stop ducking the issue. The Senate Regulated Industries and Utilities Committee is scheduled to meet again Wednesday. All members should be present, and they should vote to move the bill to the Senate floor, where senators should once and for all make their positions known.
Then, the state House of Representatives should take similarly quick and comprehensive action.
Whether Gov. Sonny Perdue - a teetotaler who has indicated his opposition - eventually signs the bill or doesn't is immaterial. Georgians on both sides of the issue should know, unequivocally, where their local lawmakers stand, so they can cast an informed ballot in the 2010 elections.
Similar posts: bc cancer agency
It's at least conceivable a vast majority of the 13-member state Senate Regulated Industries and Utilities Committee - all but two, to be exact - had legitimate reasons for missing a Wednesday meeting at which they'd been scheduled to vote on sending a Sunday alcohol sales bill to the Senate floor.
It's also conceivable, however, that the committee of nine Republicans and four Democrats simply is stalling a bill that could become politically problematic for them and their General Assembly colleagues in the upcoming 2010 elections.
It wouldn't be the first time the bill has been bottled up, so to speak. It has failed to get action in the previous two General Assembly sessions.
Senate Bill 16, sponsored by Sen. Seth Harp, R-Midland, isn't a particularly complex piece of legislation. It proposes to allow residents of cities and counties across the state the opportunity to decide whether they want to be able to buy alcohol in retail stores after noon on Sundays, if their local government is willing to call for a referendum on those sales.
During recent legislative sessions, the bill has found legislators waffling among teetotaling conservatives who don't want alcohol available in stores on the Christian holy day, retailers who say they are losing out on potential sales, and the large number of Georgians who simply want a voice in the matter. This year, discussion of the bill is attenuated by the ongoing economic downturn, which has - or should have - legislators scrambling to find any new streams of tax revenue such as Sunday alcohol sales might bring.
Here, briefly, are how the numbers in favor of Sunday store sales of alcohol break down:
Earlier this month, an official with Publix, one of Georgia's largest supermarket chains, told The Associated Press the sale of beer and wine at grocery stores on Sundays would result in $1.4 million in extra excise taxes and at least $3.3 million in new sales tax revenue.
A widely referenced InsiderAdvantage poll undertaken when the issue first surfaced in the General Assembly found 58 percent of Georgians wanted an opportunity to cast a ballot on the issue, a number that rose to 66 percent when respondents were told that only two other states - Connecticut and Indiana - don't allow Sunday store sales of alcohol.
On the other side of the issue, opponents of Sunday store sales relied last year on a widely debunked study done in New Mexico - where voters approved Sunday alcohol sales in 1995 - that purported to show a subsequent increase in alcohol-related traffic accidents and fatalities. This year, opponents opted for an even less convincing approach, bringing a few dozen teenagers into a recent Senate hearing on the bill to make the dubious argument that allowing Sunday store sales would somehow make it easier for young people to illegally buy alcohol, by extending the time it would be available to them.
In addition, and certainly of the utmost concern to state legislators, is the fact that the Christian Coalition of Georgia, according to a Wednesday report in The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, has "said it would include the issue in its political scorecard that goes out to voters."
At the end of the day, the choice facing Georgia lawmakers is clear - as it has been for a couple of years now. They face a choice of giving a clear majority of Georgians what they want at the risk of offending an at least somewhat powerful conservative Christian voting bloc.
Either way, it's time for lawmakers to stop ducking the issue. The Senate Regulated Industries and Utilities Committee is scheduled to meet again Wednesday. All members should be present, and they should vote to move the bill to the Senate floor, where senators should once and for all make their positions known.
Then, the state House of Representatives should take similarly quick and comprehensive action.
Whether Gov. Sonny Perdue - a teetotaler who has indicated his opposition - eventually signs the bill or doesn't is immaterial. Georgians on both sides of the issue should know, unequivocally, where their local lawmakers stand, so they can cast an informed ballot in the 2010 elections.
Similar posts: bc cancer agency
- Mood:lol
- Music:Tokio Hotel
EcoTrain consortium wins contract to update Quebec-Windsor feasibility studies The federal government, Qubec and Ontario have awarded a $3 million contract to update the feasibility studies for high-speed rail in the Quebec-Windsor corridor. The EcoTrain Consortium, composed of the firms Dessau, MMM Group, KPMG, Wilbur Smith Associates and Deutsche Bahn International has been awarded the contract The study, will focus on: HSR technology and route options; transportation demand forecasts; development and operating costs; environmental and social impacts; financial and economic analyses; institutional framework of foreign HSR experiences; implementation scenarios; impacts on other transportation modes; and recommendations on the future action plan. This study will allow governments to understand the scope of the proposed high-speed rail project, such as the environment, the potential demand and financial implications.
Similar posts: bc cancer agency
Similar posts: bc cancer agency
- Mood:cry
- Music:Backstreet Boys
EcoTrain consortium wins contract to update Quebec-Windsor feasibility studies The federal government, Qubec and Ontario have awarded a $3 million contract to update the feasibility studies for high-speed rail in the Quebec-Windsor corridor. The EcoTrain Consortium, composed of the firms Dessau, MMM Group, KPMG, Wilbur Smith Associates and Deutsche Bahn International has been awarded the contract The study, will focus on: HSR technology and route options; transportation demand forecasts; development and operating costs; environmental and social impacts; financial and economic analyses; institutional framework of foreign HSR experiences; implementation scenarios; impacts on other transportation modes; and recommendations on the future action plan. This study will allow governments to understand the scope of the proposed high-speed rail project, such as the environment, the potential demand and financial implications.
Similar posts: bc cancer agency
Similar posts: bc cancer agency
- Mood:bad
- Music:Backstreet Boys
Kansas City is considering a new category of liquor license. Call it wine by the sip.
If approved by the council, package liquor stores could upgrade to the new license and sell wine and only wine for consumption on the premises in servings up to 5 ounces.
The idea is to discourage free-sample freeloaders while allowing retailers and wine specialty shops a practical option to let customers sample their wares.
Ryan Sciara, managing partner of the Cellar Rat Wine Merchants shop at 17th Street and Baltimore Avenue, has been pushing the idea with city officials.
Under the current ordinance, liquor stores cant sell alcoholic beverages by the drink, though they can give away samples all day. But whenever they do, Sciara said, store operators wind up pouring for a steady stream of sippers who usually arent buyers.
We did tastings all the time, he said, but as a business model it wasnt very smart. The object is to increase retail sales.
Our intent is to not be a wine bar, but a tasting room. We pride ourselves for a unique selection of wines, and people need to have a taste before they buy.
One early draft of the ordinance also authorized sample sales of beer and hard liquor, but concerns were raised and those provisions were stripped out.
We didnt want to see people selling shots in liquor stores, said Jim Ready, assistant manager of the citys Regulated Industries Division. This was about wine tasting.
Sciara said he expected to sell samples of about 3 ounces. He hasnt settled on a price yet, but promises it will be enough to discourage freeloaders.
Meanwhile, dont expect to sip a chardonnay while doing your grocery shopping.
The proposal excludes any retailer whose alcoholic beverage sales are not at least 80 percent of the stores total sales. That eliminates grocery and convenience stores, gas stations, drugstores and most other purveyors of packaged liquor, beer and wine. Ready estimated 40 stores in the city might qualify for the new license.
But making the switch wont be automatic. Ready said any interested store owner must get approval from a majority of nearby property owners. Those neighbors shouldnt fear that a license will be a license to party on the premises. Ready said sales-by-the-drink shops will be prohibited from offering entertainment or allowing sipping on patios or anywhere outside the licensed premises.
They can charge whatever they want, said Ready, but they cant use this as a guise to make a bar out of the place.
Similar posts: bc cancer agency
- Mood:smile
- Music:Britney Spear
